Phantom risks are risks whose very existence is unproven and perhaps unprovable, yet they raise real problems at the interface of science and the law. Phantom Risk surveys a dozen scientific issues that have led to public controversy and litigation—among them, miscarriage from the use of video display terminals, birth defects in children whose mothers used the drug Bendectin, and cancer from low-intensity magnetic fields and from airborne asbestos. It presents the scientific evidence behind these and other issues and summarizes the resulting litigation. Focusing on the great disparity between the scientific evidence that is sufficient to arouse public fears and that needed to establish a hazard or its absence, these original contributions probe the problem of scientific ambiguity in risk assessment, and the mayhem this creates in the courtroom.
About the Editors
Kenneth R. Foster is Associate Professor in the Department of Bioengineering at the University of Pennsylvania.
David E. Bernstein is an attorney at the law firm of Crowell & Moring.
Peter W. Huber is a Senior Fellow of the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research and serves as Counsel to the law firm of Mayer, Brown & Platt.
"Phantom Risk is a much needed antidote for the hysteria overlow-level insult that pervades and debilitates our society."
—Alvin M. Weinberg, Distinguished Fellow, Oak RidgeAssociated Universities