How Fanatical Certitude Is Destroying Democracy
240 pp., 6 x 9 in,
- Published: August 3, 2021
- Published: August 3, 2021
Why our obsession with truth—the idea that some undeniable truth will make politics unnecessary—is driving our political polarization.
In The Divide, Taylor Dotson argues provocatively that what drives political polarization is not our disregard for facts in a post-truth era, but rather our obsession with truth. The idea that some undeniable truth will make politics unnecessary, Dotson says, is damaging democracy. We think that appealing to facts, or common sense, or nature, or the market will resolve political disputes. We view our opponents as ignorant, corrupt, or brainwashed. Dotson argues that we don't need to agree with everyone, or force everyone to agree with us; we just need to be civil enough to practice effective politics.
Dotson shows that we are misguided to pine for a lost age of respect for expertise. For one thing, such an age never happened. For another, people cannot be made into ultra-rational Vulcans. Dotson offers a road map to guide both citizens and policy makers in rethinking and refashioning political interactions to be more productive. To avoid the trap of divisive and fanatical certitude, we must stop idealizing expert knowledge and romanticizing common sense. He outlines strategies for making political disputes more productive: admitting uncertainty, sharing experiences, and tolerating and negotiating disagreement. He suggests reforms to political practices and processes, adjustments to media systems, and dramatic changes to schooling, childhood, the workplace, and other institutions. Productive and intelligent politics is not a product of embracing truth, Dotson argues, but of adopting a pluralistic democratic process.
“Taylor Dotson's The Divide offers a provocative and timely defense of democratic pluralism, not least because he shows why you, the reader, are the biggest threat to democracy. If this seems wrong-headed to you, then you must read this book. Otherwise, by refusing to engage with Dotson's argument, you prove his thesis.”
Mike Hulme, Professor of Human Geography, University of Cambridge
“One side of our political divide wants facts and experts to make political decisions. The other trusts only populist common sense. Taylor Dotson explains why they are both wrong, and shows how we can reconstruct democracy by encouraging more disagreement in a pluralistic way. I agree.”
Lawrence Susskind, Ford Professor of Urban and Environmental Planning, MIT
"A sharp portrait of our deeply fractured political system...An important demonstration that to thrive—indeed, to survive—our fissured democracy must be far more democratic...his arguments are cogent, his optimism profound."
"Lucid writing, illuminating examples, and a firm point of view make this a refreshing take on contemporary political dysfunctions."
“A thorough and intellectual analysis...Dotson successfully describes why most proposals to correct gridlock and polarization are flawed by showing how they fail to address underlying causes and even flirt with worsening the situation.”
Los Angeles Review of Books