The Primacy of Grammar
Favorite Add to Favorites

The Primacy of Grammar

By Nirmalangshu Mukherji

A proposal that the biolinguistic approach to human languages may have identified, beyond the study of language, a specific structure of the human mind.

A Bradford Book

Overview

Author(s)

Praise

Summary

A proposal that the biolinguistic approach to human languages may have identified, beyond the study of language, a specific structure of the human mind.

The contemporary discipline of biolinguistics is beginning to have the feel of scientific inquiry. Biolinguistics—especially the work of Noam Chomsky—suggests that the design of language may be “perfect”: language is an optimal solution to conditions of sound and meaning. What is the scope of this inquiry? Which aspect of nature does this science investigate? What is its relation to the rest of science? What notions of language and mind are under investigation? This book is a study of such foundational questions. Exploring Chomsky's claims, Nirmalangshu Mukherji argues that the significance of biolinguistic inquiry extends beyond the domain of language.

Biolinguistics is primarily concerned with grammars that represent just the computational aspects of the mind/brain. This restriction to grammars, Mukherji argues, opens the possibility that the computational system of human language may be involved in each cognitive system that requires similar computational resources. Deploying analytical argumentation and empirical evidence, Mukherji suggests that a computational system of language consisting of very specific principles and operations is likely to be involved in each articulatory symbol system—such as music—that manifests unboundedness. In that sense, the biolinguistics approach may have identified, after thousands of years of inquiry, a specific structure of the human mind.

Hardcover

Out of Print ISBN: 9780262014052 298 pp. | 9 in x 6 in 11 figures

Paperback

$5.75 S | £4.99 ISBN: 9780262517430 298 pp. | 9 in x 6 in 11 figures

Endorsements

  • It is a sign of maturity for any given field that a philosopher should reflect on its foundations. When the philosopher understands the field in its technical minutiae, it is a privilege, even a contribution. Moreover, given its approach and scope, a work like Mukherji's should reach a wide audience beyond linguistics, which is vital for the dissemination of the biolinguistics project that he elegantly introduces.

    Juan Uriagereka

    Department of Linguistics, University of Maryland