Weaving the Dark Web

From The Information Society Series

Weaving the Dark Web

Legitimacy on Freenet, Tor, and I2P

By Robert W. Gehl

An exploration of the Dark Web—websites accessible only with special routing software—that examines the history of three anonymizing networks, Freenet, Tor, and I2P.





An exploration of the Dark Web—websites accessible only with special routing software—that examines the history of three anonymizing networks, Freenet, Tor, and I2P.

The term “Dark Web” conjures up drug markets, unregulated gun sales, stolen credit cards. But, as Robert Gehl points out in Weaving the Dark Web, for each of these illegitimate uses, there are other, legitimate ones: the New York Times's anonymous whistleblowing system, for example, and the use of encryption by political dissidents. Defining the Dark Web straightforwardly as websites that can be accessed only with special routing software, and noting the frequent use of “legitimate” and its variations by users, journalists, and law enforcement to describe Dark Web practices (judging them “legit” or “sh!t”), Gehl uses the concept of legitimacy as a window into the Dark Web. He does so by examining the history of three Dark Web systems: Freenet, Tor, and I2P. Gehl presents three distinct meanings of legitimate: legitimate force, or the state's claim to a monopoly on violence; organizational propriety; and authenticity. He explores how Freenet, Tor, and I2P grappled with these different meanings, and then discusses each form of legitimacy in detail by examining Dark Web markets, search engines, and social networking sites. Finally, taking a broader view of the Dark Web, Gehl argues for the value of anonymous political speech in a time of ubiquitous surveillance. If we shut down the Dark Web, he argues, we lose a valuable channel for dissent.


$30.00 X ISBN: 9780262038263 288 pp. | 6 in x 9 in


  • Weaving the Dark Web: Legitimacy on Freenet, Tor, and I2P presents legitimacy through thoroughly-researched and organized frames. The telling of esoteric computer science history, the use of archival text from listservs, interviews with developers and users, and concepts from varied disciplines deepen the exploration and leave the reader satiated. The chapters weave and complement each other as we struggle with legitimacy in communication and in power.

    Internet Histories: Digital Technology, Culture and Society


  • Here Gehl deftly navigates the ambivalent, sometimes counterintuitive ways 'legitimacy' is used to describe the Dark Web's uses and meanings. This approach simultaneously illuminates the discursive contours of the Dark Web and situates it within broader conversations about the power dynamics, social formations, and political implications baked into networked technologies.

    Whitney Phillips

    Assistant Professor of Communication, Culture, and Digital Technologies, Syracuse University; author of This Is Why We Can't Have Nice Things: Mapping the Relationship between Online Trolling and Mainstream Culture; and coauthor (with Ryan Milner) of The Ambivalent Internet: Mischief, Oddity, and Antagonism Online

  • Gehl treats us to a brilliant analysis of the technologies, uses, and users of the Dark Web. Replacing sensationalist myths with sensitive and profound ethnography, Weaving the Dark Web is essential reading on a sorely neglected field of Internet studies.

    Nicholas John

    Senior Lecturer in the Department of Communication, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem; author of The Age of Sharing

  • This book is 'legit,' a fascinating and accomplished exploration of a sociotechnical frontier, the Dark Web. Drawing together contemporary thought and presenting new insights, this book moves our understanding of the technological practices and social milieu occupying these emergent digital spaces forward. A must-read for Internet scholars and the digitally curious.

    Alexia Maddox

    Lecturer in Communications, School of Communication and Creative Arts, Deakin University (Melbourne, Australia); author of Research Methods and Global Online Communities: A Case Study